2025-11-21 Security Report: Key Vulnerability Findings

In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, security vulnerability reports play a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of systems and data. This comprehensive security summary report for November 21, 2025, provides an in-depth analysis of potential vulnerabilities identified by various security scanning tools. This report covers findings from Bandit, Checkov, Dockle, and Nuclei, offering a holistic view of the security posture of the assessed repository. We will delve into the specifics of each report, highlighting critical issues and providing actionable insights for remediation. Understanding these findings is paramount for developers, system administrators, and security professionals to proactively address potential threats and safeguard their applications and infrastructure.

Bandit Security Report: Python Code Analysis

The Bandit security report focuses on identifying security vulnerabilities in Python code. Bandit is an open-source tool designed to scan Python code for common security issues. It checks for things like hardcoded passwords, SQL injection vulnerabilities, and other potential security flaws. On this occasion, the Bandit report indicates a single LOW severity issue, highlighting the importance of continuous monitoring and code review practices.

Summary of Findings

• 🔴 HIGH: 0
• 🟠 MEDIUM: 0
• 🟡 LOW: 1
• ⚪ TOTAL: 1

This summary reveals that while there are no high or medium severity issues, a low severity issue was detected. Addressing even low severity issues is crucial for maintaining a robust security posture. Ignoring minor vulnerabilities can sometimes lead to exploitation through chaining vulnerabilities or other attack vectors.

Detailed Breakdown

The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the identified issue:

Severity	Issue	File	Line
LOW	try_except_continue	./med.py	100

The try_except_continue issue at line 100 in ./med.py indicates a potential problem in the error handling logic. Specifically, the use of continue within a try-except block might mask underlying issues or prevent proper error handling. While not immediately critical, this pattern could lead to unexpected behavior or make debugging more challenging. It's advisable to review the code and ensure that exceptions are handled appropriately and that the control flow is well-defined.

To effectively address this issue, consider the following steps:

1. Review the Code: Carefully examine the try-except block in ./med.py at line 100 to understand the intended behavior.
2. Assess the Risk: Determine if the use of continue could potentially lead to unhandled errors or unexpected outcomes.
3. Implement Proper Error Handling: Modify the code to ensure that exceptions are properly logged, handled, or propagated as necessary. Avoid using continue in a way that masks errors.
4. Test Thoroughly: After making changes, run comprehensive tests to verify that the error handling logic is functioning as expected and that no new issues have been introduced.

Regularly running Bandit scans as part of the development process can help identify such issues early on, making them easier and less costly to fix. Additionally, adopting secure coding practices and conducting peer code reviews can further minimize the risk of introducing vulnerabilities.

Checkov IaC Security Report: Infrastructure as Code Scanning

Checkov is an IaC (Infrastructure as Code) security scanner that helps identify misconfigurations in infrastructure code. It supports various IaC formats, including Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, and more. In this report, Checkov found no misconfigurations, indicating that the infrastructure code adheres to security best practices. This is a positive finding, reflecting a strong foundation for secure infrastructure deployment.

Summary of Findings

✅ No misconfigurations found.

The absence of misconfigurations in the Checkov report is a testament to the security practices implemented in the infrastructure code. However, it's essential to maintain vigilance and continue to run regular scans as the infrastructure evolves. New misconfigurations can be introduced through updates, changes, or human error.

To ensure ongoing security of your infrastructure as code, consider the following best practices:

1. Automate Security Scanning: Integrate Checkov (or a similar IaC security scanner) into your CI/CD pipeline to automatically scan infrastructure code changes.
2. Regularly Update Policies: Keep your Checkov policies up-to-date to incorporate the latest security best practices and compliance requirements.
3. Educate Your Team: Provide training to your infrastructure team on secure IaC practices and common misconfigurations to avoid.
4. Implement Code Reviews: Conduct peer code reviews of infrastructure code changes to catch potential security issues before they are deployed.
5. Monitor and Alert: Set up monitoring and alerting to notify you of any new Checkov findings or policy violations.

By proactively addressing potential misconfigurations in infrastructure code, organizations can significantly reduce their attack surface and improve their overall security posture.

Dockle Security Summary: Docker Image Analysis

Dockle is a security tool specifically designed for scanning Docker images. It checks for best practices and common security issues in Dockerfiles and container images. This report reveals several findings, including FATAL, WARN, and INFO level issues, highlighting areas that need attention to improve container security.

Summary of Findings

• 🔴 FATAL: 4
• 🟡 WARN: 2
• 🟢 INFO: 4
• ✅ PASS: 6

The presence of FATAL issues indicates critical security concerns that must be addressed immediately. WARN issues represent potential problems that should be investigated and resolved, while INFO issues provide recommendations for further improving security. The PASS results indicate that certain security checks have been met.

Detailed Breakdown of Issues

🔴 FATAL Issues

Code	Message
CIS-DI-0009	Use COPY instead of ADD in Dockerfile
CIS-DI-0010	Do not store credential in environment variables/files
DKL-DI-0001	Avoid sudo command
DKL-DI-0005	Clear apt-get caches

These FATAL issues represent significant security risks and should be addressed with the highest priority. Let's examine each issue in more detail:

1. CIS-DI-0009: Use COPY instead of ADD in Dockerfile: The ADD instruction in Dockerfiles has some implicit behaviors (like automatic extraction of compressed files) that can introduce security risks. It's generally recommended to use COPY instead, which is more predictable and less prone to misuse.
2. CIS-DI-0010: Do not store credentials in environment variables/files: Storing credentials (like passwords, API keys, etc.) in environment variables or files within a Docker image is a major security vulnerability. This can lead to unauthorized access if the image is compromised. Use more secure methods for managing credentials, such as Docker Secrets or external secrets management tools.
3. DKL-DI-0001: Avoid sudo command: Using sudo within a Dockerfile or container can introduce privilege escalation vulnerabilities. Containers should be run with the least necessary privileges. Avoid using sudo unless absolutely necessary, and consider alternative approaches to accomplish the required tasks without elevated privileges.
4. DKL-DI-0005: Clear apt-get caches: Leaving apt-get caches in a Docker image can increase its size and potentially introduce security vulnerabilities. Always clear the apt-get caches after installing packages to reduce the attack surface and improve image efficiency.

🟡 WARN Issues

Code	Message
CIS-DI-0001	Create a user for the container
DKL-DI-0006	Avoid latest tag

These WARN issues indicate potential security concerns that should be investigated and addressed:

1. CIS-DI-0001: Create a user for the container: Running containers as the root user is a security risk. Create a non-root user within the container and run the application under that user to minimize the impact of potential vulnerabilities.
2. DKL-DI-0006: Avoid latest tag: Using the latest tag for Docker images can lead to unpredictable behavior, as the image can change without notice. Always use specific version tags to ensure consistency and avoid unexpected issues.

🟢 INFO Issues

Code	Message
CIS-DI-0005	Enable Content trust for Docker
CIS-DI-0006	Add HEALTHCHECK instruction to the container image
CIS-DI-0008	Confirm safety of setuid/setgid files
DKL-LI-0003	Only put necessary files

These INFO issues provide recommendations for improving container security:

1. CIS-DI-0005: Enable Content trust for Docker: Docker Content Trust (DCT) provides a mechanism for ensuring the integrity and authenticity of Docker images. Enabling DCT helps prevent the use of compromised or malicious images.
2. CIS-DI-0006: Add HEALTHCHECK instruction to the container image: The HEALTHCHECK instruction allows Docker to monitor the health of containers and restart them if they become unhealthy. This improves the reliability and availability of applications running in containers.
3. CIS-DI-0008: Confirm safety of setuid/setgid files: setuid and setgid files can introduce privilege escalation vulnerabilities if not configured correctly. Ensure that these files are necessary and properly secured.
4. DKL-LI-0003: Only put necessary files: Minimizing the number of files in a Docker image reduces the attack surface and improves image efficiency. Only include the files that are strictly necessary for the application to run.

Addressing the issues identified by Dockle is crucial for ensuring the security and integrity of containerized applications. Prioritize FATAL issues, address WARN issues, and consider INFO recommendations to further enhance container security.

Nuclei DAST Report: Dynamic Application Security Testing

Nuclei is a fast and flexible open-source vulnerability scanner that performs DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing). It sends requests to the application and analyzes the responses to identify potential vulnerabilities. The Nuclei report in this summary found 16 issues on the Local Build, indicating the presence of potential security vulnerabilities that require further investigation.

Summary of Findings

Found 16 issues on Local Build.

The finding of 16 issues highlights the importance of regular DAST scans to identify vulnerabilities in running applications. While the summary provides the number of issues, the details of these findings are crucial for understanding the specific vulnerabilities and their potential impact.

Top Findings

Severity	Name	Path

The absence of specific details in the table indicates that the full Nuclei report (artifact) should be consulted for detailed information about the identified vulnerabilities. This report typically includes the severity, name, path, and other relevant information for each finding.

To effectively address the issues identified by Nuclei, consider the following steps:

1. Review the Full Report: Consult the full Nuclei report (artifact) to understand the specific details of each vulnerability.
2. Prioritize Vulnerabilities: Assess the severity and potential impact of each vulnerability and prioritize remediation efforts accordingly.
3. Reproduce and Verify: Attempt to reproduce the vulnerabilities to confirm their existence and understand the attack vectors.
4. Implement Remediation: Apply the necessary fixes or mitigations to address the vulnerabilities.
5. Retest: After implementing remediation, re-run Nuclei to verify that the vulnerabilities have been successfully resolved.

Integrating Nuclei into the CI/CD pipeline and performing regular DAST scans can help identify vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle, making them easier and less costly to fix. Additionally, security teams should collaborate with developers to ensure that vulnerabilities are addressed promptly and effectively.

Conclusion

This security summary report provides a comprehensive overview of potential vulnerabilities identified by various security scanning tools. The findings from Bandit, Checkov, Dockle, and Nuclei highlight the importance of continuous monitoring, proactive security measures, and a holistic approach to security. By addressing the issues identified in this report and implementing best practices for secure coding, infrastructure management, and containerization, organizations can significantly improve their security posture and protect their systems and data from potential threats.

For more information on security best practices and vulnerability management, consider exploring resources from trusted sources such as OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project).