Code Security Report: 3 Findings In SAST-UP-DEV

In this code security report, we delve into the findings of the latest security scan for the SAST-UP-DEV project. Understanding and addressing these vulnerabilities is crucial for maintaining the integrity and security of your application. This report highlights the scan metadata and provides detailed information about each finding, including severity, vulnerability type, affected file, and remediation resources. Let's dive into the specifics of the scan and the vulnerabilities detected.

Scan Metadata

This section provides an overview of the scan performed, including key metrics and details about the project's security posture. It helps you quickly grasp the scope and impact of the findings.

• Latest Scan: 2025-11-28 05:24am
• Total Findings: 3 | New Findings: 3 | Resolved Findings: 1
• Tested Project Files: 2
• Detected Programming Languages: 2 (Python *, Java *)

To manually trigger a scan, check the box below:

• [ ] Check this box to manually trigger a scan

Note: GitHub may take a few seconds to process actions triggered via checkboxes. Please wait until the change is visible before continuing.

The scan metadata indicates a comprehensive assessment of the project, revealing three new findings that require attention. The presence of multiple programming languages, such as Python and Java, suggests the need for a broad security approach that considers the nuances of each language. Regular scans and prompt resolution of findings are essential practices for maintaining a secure codebase. By understanding the metadata, developers can prioritize their efforts and focus on the most critical vulnerabilities. This proactive approach minimizes potential risks and ensures the application remains resilient against threats. The ability to manually trigger scans provides flexibility and allows for immediate assessments after code changes or updates. This feature is particularly useful in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, where timely feedback on security is paramount.

Finding Details

This section presents a detailed breakdown of each vulnerability detected during the scan. It includes the severity level, vulnerability type, Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifier, affected file, data flows, and detection date. Each finding is accompanied by links to vulnerable code snippets and relevant training material to facilitate remediation.

The following table summarizes the vulnerabilities identified:

Each vulnerability is categorized by severity, allowing developers to prioritize remediation efforts effectively. The vulnerability type provides a clear indication of the security flaw, while the CWE identifier links to a standardized description of the weakness. The affected file and data flows offer specific context, enabling developers to pinpoint the exact location of the vulnerability and understand its potential impact. The detection date provides a timeline for addressing the issue. This detailed information empowers developers to take targeted action and mitigate the identified risks. By clicking on the provided links, developers can access the vulnerable code directly and explore training materials to enhance their understanding of the vulnerability and its remediation. This comprehensive approach ensures that security issues are not only resolved but also serve as learning opportunities for the development team. Regular reviews of finding details and proactive remediation are crucial for maintaining a strong security posture.

Hardcoded Password/Credentials

• Severity: Medium
• Vulnerability Type: Hardcoded Password/Credentials
• CWE: CWE-798
• File: SQLInjection.java:21
• Data Flows: 1
• Detected: 2025-11-28 05:24am

Hardcoded credentials pose a significant security risk, as they can be easily discovered and exploited by attackers. This vulnerability, identified in SQLInjection.java at line 21, involves storing sensitive information, such as passwords or API keys, directly in the code. This practice violates security best practices and can lead to unauthorized access to critical systems and data. The medium severity assigned to this finding underscores the need for prompt remediation. To address this issue, developers should replace hardcoded credentials with secure alternatives, such as environment variables or dedicated secrets management solutions. These methods ensure that sensitive information is stored securely and accessed only when necessary. Regular code reviews and static analysis tools can help prevent the introduction of hardcoded credentials in the future. By adopting a proactive approach to credential management, organizations can significantly reduce their attack surface and protect against potential breaches. The training materials and videos provided by Secure Code Warrior offer valuable insights into the risks associated with hardcoded credentials and effective remediation techniques. These resources can help developers enhance their understanding of secure coding practices and implement robust security measures.

Vulnerable Code

https://github.com/SAST-UP-DEV/SAST-Test-Repo-1002de0c-9641-4722-9ae2-778197b605ae/blob/e671be6806458220e7770eb4acd32db4c0571d4e/SQLInjection.java#L21

Secure Code Warrior Training Material

• Training
  • Secure Code Warrior Hardcoded Password/Credentials Training
• Videos
  • Secure Code Warrior Hardcoded Password/Credentials Video

Suppress Finding

• [ ] ... as False Alarm
• [ ] ... as Acceptable Risk