PEP 541 Request: Claiming The Abandoned Pymcserver Project

Nov 25, 2025 by Alex Johnson 59 views

This article discusses the request to claim the abandoned PyPI project, pymcserver, under PEP 541 guidelines. The original project appears to be unmaintained and potentially unsafe, warranting a name transfer to ensure the availability of a secure and updated package for the Python community.

Project to be Claimed: pymcserver

The project in question is pymcserver, which can be found on PyPI at https://pypi.org/project/pymcserver. This package, intended as an MC Server Wrapper, has remained untouched since its initial release on April 8, 2021. This extended period of inactivity, coupled with serious concerns about its implementation, motivates the request for a name transfer.

Your PyPI Username: magi8101

The request is being made by the PyPI user magi8101, whose profile can be viewed at https://pypi.org/user/magi8101. This user intends to replace the existing, potentially harmful package with a maintained and secure alternative.

Reasons for the Request: Addressing Abandonment and Security Concerns

The primary reasons for this request fall into two critical categories: abandonment and security vulnerabilities. The pymcserver project exhibits clear signs of abandonment, having received no updates or maintenance for nearly four years. Furthermore, the package's implementation raises serious security concerns, making it imperative to address these issues for the safety of the Python community. Let's delve deeper into these critical factors:

Abandonment: A Project Lost in Time

The most glaring issue with the pymcserver project is its abandonment. The project's sole release dates back to April 8, 2021, a significant period of inactivity in the fast-evolving world of software. This lack of updates raises concerns about the package's compatibility with newer Python versions and its ability to address potential security vulnerabilities that may have emerged since its release. The absence of maintenance effectively renders the package obsolete and unreliable for users seeking a stable solution.

Examining the PKG-INFO metadata further underscores this point. All critical fields, such as author, email, homepage, and license, are marked as “UNKNOWN.” This complete lack of identifying information makes it impossible to contact the original maintainer and leaves the project orphaned. The project offers no documentation, no accessible repository, and no discernible means of reaching out for support or clarification. This complete disconnect between the project and its users is a hallmark of abandonment.

The consequences of using an abandoned package extend beyond mere inconvenience. An unmaintained package is a potential security risk, as vulnerabilities remain unpatched and compatibility issues unresolved. Users who rely on abandoned packages expose themselves to potential exploits and compatibility conflicts, highlighting the need for a proactive approach to address such situations.

Security Concerns: A Ticking Time Bomb

Beyond its abandoned state, the pymcserver project harbors significant security vulnerabilities. The package's behavior, as revealed in its source code, involves downloading and executing external binaries from unverified URLs. This practice is inherently risky, as it opens the door to malicious code injection and exposes users to potential harm. Imagine a scenario where the downloaded binary contains malware; users who install pymcserver would unknowingly compromise their systems.

Furthermore, the package's use of pyautogui to inject keystrokes raises additional red flags. Pyautogui, while a useful tool for automating GUI interactions, can be exploited for malicious purposes if used improperly. In the context of pymcserver, the keystroke injection functionality raises concerns about potential unauthorized access and control over the user's system. This unorthodox approach to server management raises eyebrows and necessitates a thorough security review.

The combination of downloading unverified binaries and injecting keystrokes constitutes a severe security risk. These practices violate PyPI's security expectations, which emphasize the importance of protecting users from malicious code and ensuring the integrity of packages. The current state of pymcserver directly contradicts these principles, making a name transfer essential to safeguard the PyPI ecosystem.

In summary, the abandonment and security concerns surrounding pymcserver necessitate immediate action. The lack of maintenance, coupled with the presence of potentially harmful code, justifies a name-transfer request under PEP 541. Allowing the project to remain in its current state poses a significant risk to the Python community, underscoring the urgency of this request.

Metadata-Version: 1.0
Name: pymcserver
Version: 1.12.26
Summary: MC Server Wrapper
Home-page: UNKNOWN
Author: UNKNOWN
Author-email: UNKNOWN
License: UNKNOWN
Description: Add later
Platform: UNKNOWN

The __init__.py file (https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23751810/init.py) and setup.py file (https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23751820/setup.py) further demonstrate the project's basic structure and lack of comprehensive metadata.

Maintenance or Replacement? A Commitment to a Safer Package

The intention behind claiming pymcserver is replacement. The current package's security vulnerabilities and abandoned status make it unsuitable for continued use. A complete overhaul and replacement with a secure, maintained version is the only viable solution to address the identified issues. This approach ensures that users have access to a reliable MC Server Wrapper without compromising their system's security.

Source Code Repositories: From Absence to Active Development

Original project repository:

A significant challenge in addressing the pymcserver situation is the absence of an original source code repository. The maintainer did not provide any links to a GitHub repository, a homepage, or any other platform where the source code could be accessed or discussed. The PKG-INFO metadata lists all project URLs as UNKNOWN, effectively making the maintainer unreachable and the codebase inaccessible. This lack of transparency further underscores the project's abandoned state and the difficulty in assessing its original intent.

The absence of a repository also hinders the community's ability to contribute to the project or identify and address potential issues. Open-source projects thrive on collaboration and transparency, but pymcserver lacks these fundamental elements. This isolation makes it even more critical to replace the existing package with one that adheres to open-source principles and fosters community involvement.

My replacement project repository:

In contrast to the original project, the replacement pymcserver will be hosted on GitHub at https://github.com/magi8101/pymcserver. This repository will serve as the central hub for the project's development, maintenance, and community interaction. By making the source code publicly available, users can inspect the implementation, contribute improvements, and report issues, fostering a collaborative and transparent environment.

The repository will include comprehensive documentation, clear contribution guidelines, and a robust issue tracking system. This commitment to transparency and community engagement will ensure that the replacement pymcserver remains a reliable and secure solution for users. The decision to host the project on GitHub reflects a dedication to open-source principles and a desire to build a thriving community around the package.

[Image 1]

Contact and Additional Research: A Thorough Investigation

A comprehensive effort was made to contact the current owner of pymcserver before initiating this PEP 541 request. However, these attempts were unsuccessful due to the complete lack of contact information associated with the project. This thorough investigation highlights the project's abandoned status and the necessity of proceeding with a name transfer to ensure the availability of a maintained alternative.

1. No Contact Details Anywhere: A Dead End

The most significant obstacle in reaching out to the maintainer was the complete absence of contact information. As previously mentioned, the PKG-INFO file lists everything as UNKNOWN, including the author name, email address, and homepage. This void of information made it impossible to directly contact the maintainer through conventional channels. The PyPI project page itself does not provide any additional information or links that could lead to the owner. There is no GitHub repository, website, maintainer profile, or any other means of reaching out. This lack of a digital footprint is a strong indicator of abandonment and a significant impediment to communication.

The source files themselves were also devoid of any contact information. The absence of a README file, comments, or any other indication of the project's authorship further complicated the search for the maintainer. This complete lack of identifying information made it exceptionally challenging to establish any form of communication.

2. What I Tried to Check: Leaving No Stone Unturned

Despite the lack of readily available contact information, a diligent effort was made to exhaust all possible avenues of communication. The source package was downloaded and thoroughly examined in the hopes of uncovering hidden contact information or clues about the maintainer's identity. This involved scrutinizing the code, metadata, and any other files included in the package. However, this search yielded no results, further confirming the absence of contact information.

An extensive online search was also conducted, utilizing the project name and any potential maintainer names gleaned from the package's limited metadata. This search encompassed various platforms, including search engines, social media networks, and developer communities. The objective was to identify any online presence associated with the project or its maintainer. Unfortunately, this search also proved fruitless, highlighting the maintainer's complete lack of online activity related to pymcserver.

The project's release history was also carefully reviewed. The fact that the project has only one release, dating back to April 8, 2021, and has remained untouched since that day, further reinforces the impression of abandonment. This prolonged period of inactivity suggests that the maintainer has either lost interest in the project or is unable to continue its maintenance.

3. Additional Observation: Potential Name Squatting?

During the research process, an intriguing observation was made regarding other packages potentially owned by the same user. It appears that the same user may own several other packages on PyPI that exhibit similar characteristics to pymcserver: they seem unused, abandoned, and have not been updated for years. These packages appear to be simple placeholders rather than actively maintained projects.

While no assumptions are being made about the maintainer's intentions, this observation raises concerns about potential name squatting on PyPI. Name squatting occurs when users register package names without the intention of actively developing or maintaining them, effectively preventing others from using those names for legitimate projects. While this is not necessarily malicious, it can hinder the growth of the Python ecosystem by limiting the availability of desirable package names.

It is suggested that PyPI administrators conduct a brief review of these other packages to determine whether they are also abandoned or represent potential instances of name squatting. This review would help ensure that package names are being used responsibly and that the PyPI registry remains a vibrant and accessible resource for the Python community.

In conclusion, the extensive efforts to contact the maintainer of pymcserver have been unsuccessful due to the complete absence of contact information and the project's clear signs of abandonment. This thorough investigation underscores the necessity of proceeding with the PEP 541 request to ensure the availability of a maintained and secure alternative for the Python community.

[Image 2] [Image 3] [Image 4] [Image 5]

Code of Conduct: A Commitment to Ethical Conduct

[x] I agree to follow the PSF Code of Conduct

This request aligns with the Python Software Foundation's (PSF) Code of Conduct, ensuring a respectful and ethical approach to community interactions and project maintenance. By adhering to the Code of Conduct, the replacement pymcserver project will foster a welcoming and inclusive environment for contributors and users alike.

In conclusion, the request to claim the pymcserver project under PEP 541 is driven by the need to address serious security vulnerabilities and the project's abandoned state. By transferring the project name, a maintained and secure alternative can be provided to the Python community, ensuring the availability of a reliable MC Server Wrapper. This action will safeguard users from potential harm and promote the responsible use of the PyPI registry. You can also check the Python Software Foundation website to better understand the community guidelines.